Saturday, June 04, 2005

My reply to yet another comment on my application

Dear John Bollocks,

With all due respect, this is the first time I have had to justify myself to a pair of gonads. But let me begin.

First, I will address your doubts as to the relevancy of my outstanding achievement in Elementary Mathematics. As I hope you know, Elementary Mathematics is the foundation of ALL mathematics. My firm grounding in the basics is the perfect platform for me to pursue higher learning, be it thermodynamics or accounting, when I become President, should the need arise. This potential for growth, I am sure you will recognise, is essential for any supreme leader to possess.

Over and above that, however, my distinction in Elementary Mathematics proves that I can focus on the simple things i.e. you and your fellow heartlanders. This is why I am certain that, contrary to your concerns, I will be able to deal with your prosaic day-to-day problems with ease.

Having said that, let me impress upon you that it is not the President’s job to deal with the people’s “problems”. He has been elected to attend dinner parties, appear on NKF charity shows every week and say “yes” to the parade commander at National Day Parades. A most grueling schedule awaits whoever has the capacity for the job which is why he must be unencumbered by such petty problems as a public transport fare hike.

Which leads me to your “grumble”. At the end of your letter, you beseech me to help you help yourselves. That, my testicular friend, is exactly what the government is already doing. Your concern is the fare hike but that is only one side of the story. Our esteemed government is more cunning than you imagine. It has coupled the fare hike with the introduction of additional ERP gantries in a pincer movement that will squeeze you louts out of the hedonistic rut you find yourselves in now and keep you at home to watch more TCS 8 drama serials or Channel News Later. This is a masterstroke of governance that I can only applaud and which also gives me the added pleasure of sitting on even more money in the national coffers.

This is, of course, beneficial to everyone. More money in the reserves means more money for the people. Our wise leadership is squeezing you dry now so that they can reward you fools with such delights as a huge ferris wheel not unlike the one you might have come across in London but which is still Uniquely Singapore. I never fail to marvel at the compassion and empathy that is flowing infinitely from the ministries of our government. That is why I so dearly desire to join its ranks at the very top.

You claim that this country needs a superhero to guide us. Would you, perchance, be thinking of that demi-god Kim Jong Il? Or perhaps the inspiring Hugo Chavez? I certainly hope not. We need a leader who has his head on his shoulders. Not one prone to carving statues of himself or *gasp* hosting his own TV show.

Sincerely yours,

16 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Mr President Hopeful

It is a sickening irony isn't it? Full of bollocks..


Still unconvinced that how you could be the symbolic figure head of our island country.


John Bollocks on Sweating Saturday

6/04/2005 1:37 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Mr President Hopeful,

As masterfully as you have put it, it is still unconcievable how your inadequate albeit impressive span of skills are able to set yourself beyond the benchmarks that the wonderful incumbent have already established.

Please do not discount the amount of contemplation and careful thought put in before the final decision to build us the wonderful pair of insect eyes. Yes, although it was intended for the foreign legion to come and experience our unique Singaporean acting, do not forget we also have a colossal population of 4.3 million local folk who would queue overnight just for tickets to PCK the musical. This significant number mind you include the 1.3 million babies under 3 years old, and the 1 million elderly folk who ransack garbage bins for smokes. Yes, everyone loves a bit of PCK.

Please do not also forget the extents we go to to make transportation a bliss. We aim to have mrt tracks outside each and every household so not a single man need to use the roads we so happily build too. But in case you do feel the compelling need to seek alternative modes of transport, we have for you 4 taxi companies just to fulfill that need. Yes, there are many ways to kill a rodent, and we let you decide.

Choco Barruto

6/04/2005 3:53 pm  
Blogger Joel said...

Dear Choco Barruto,

I am deeply disappointed that you (as with sweating John Bollocks) are not convinced of my suitability for the role of President. On the bright side, you seem to be as much in awe of our wonderful government as I am. This is truly a coming together of great minds.

I agree with you wholeheartedly that the insect eyes were a splendid idea. The statistics you quote leave me positively brimming with pride. Just one pair so far and the artistic sensibilities of our previously primitive people have been uplifted to the point of being able to take joy from such a masterpiece as PCK the musical. Who knows what a few more pairs will do to elevate their taste? Perhaps, they might even start to appreciate the likes of such icons as Jack Neo and Moses Lim. The possibilities excite me to no end.

Regarding the transportation issue, it is true I failed to acknowledge the painstaking effort our magnanimous government puts into constructing infrastructure that the common man will not be able to afford to use. I assumed that it was a point too obvious to make but, apparently, no point is too obvious to make when it comes to politics. I also agree that the ways in which roadkill can be, well, killed are truly staggering and we certainly have the government to thank for its foresight. But I would like to add to your excellent points. I must bring it to the people’s attention that by raising fares and adding ERP gantries, the government is not being autocratic or paternalistic. Quite the contrary (and I will borrow from that classic novel Catch 22 here), the government is respecting “the historic right of free men to pay as much as they have to for the things they need in order to survive.” It all makes such beautiful sense.

Best regards,

6/05/2005 12:52 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Mr Presidential Hopeful

I certainly hope that you have read the saturday's straits times. It seems no one wants the top post in our 'fine country'

According to what was written, it seems some 4xx singaporeans qualify for the top post based upon their strigent citerions.

To which, Mr John Bollocks have to agree..who wants Mr Bollocks or someone without a proper track record to represent our fine country. I for one wouldn't qualify. Can you imagine a president blogging this late at night? Hardly right?


As to the discussion of the insect eyes, Mr John Bollocks seems to think the building looks simply too obscene with that Swisshotel Westin erected right in the middle. Looks someone precious manhood from a certain angle.

Especially so, if you driving along a certain expressway called the ECP.

Mr PCK as president. Don't pray pray wow! At least I think he makes a better candidate than those 4xx top dogs in Singapore that straitstimes think can take the top job as president. PCK connects with the common folks! Whereas the other 4xx don't. PCK for President.

Quite frankly, election day is quite simply a day for Mr John Bollocks as well as many of the heartlanders to catch up on some sleep. That's hardly a lie. A lie applies to those who have to work on that day lar.

You can verify the past few elections to be certain. A certain electrifyin party wins by zapping their opponents silly well before election begins. Such is the irony of our island state.


Sleepless John Bollocks

6/05/2005 3:48 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Mr President Hopeful


After much musings, I strongly feel that PCK can indeed be our next super hero. I mean just imagine Singapore's very own superman with red underwear and trademark yellow boots! Potent combo! Best in Singapore and JB and some even say Bantam!

Argh..I almost forgot about that classic mole...


Sleepless John Bollocks

6/05/2005 3:56 am  
Blogger Joel said...

AARRRRGGHHHHHHHH!!!

6/05/2005 3:04 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Mr President hopeful,

Mr Bollocks and I happen to live in the same constituency in the north-east side of Singapore.

While I am a serious dog lover, I have to say cats do not deserve the same attention from me. In fact, I hate them to the core!!! The only time I even look at them is to make sure they are at least 6 metres away from me.

I say this with supporting facts that cats are arrogant, individualistic, ugly and yes, noisy!

I would gladly give you my precious vote if you vow to exterminate this menace from my estate.

The presence and the endless mating calls of these animals not only pose a danger to the residents, they threaten the existence of rats in our eco-friendly environment.

For a long time, there has been a misconception towards mice and rats. If you have watched Stuart Little in the past, you would have realised that rodents too, have feelings and emotions. They too have their fears. Their precious lives are at stake each and everyday with the growing population of the cats.

Please, do something. Do not contribute to the extinction of the rats by condoning the behaviour of the feline.

Thank you.

Suzanne Lim

6/06/2005 12:09 am  
Blogger Da Froggie said...

Dear Suzannne,

While I empathise with what you are going through. I mean your traumatic feline experience.

While Cats are aloof and proud. But let us not forget that there is such a national cat called the Singapore Cat but there are no Singapore Dog.

Given the above fact, I reckon it is difficult for our Presidential Hopeful to mitigate the situation.
Is it not so?

6/06/2005 11:45 am  
Blogger Joel said...

I don’t know if they explained why those chose a cat instead of a dog. Maybe it was just down to chance. Maybe it’s because dogs are haram. Or maybe there already are Singapura dogs and they’re all in high office. I’m not ruling that one out.

6/06/2005 11:39 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Mr Presidential Hopeful

I forgot to tell that the Singapore Cat is no urban legend. You can google on the following: KUCINTA - THE LOVE CAT OF SINGAPORE.

Anyhow, you are right. I am a dog lover.

Mr John Ballocks

6/07/2005 12:13 am  
Blogger Joel said...

Dear Bollocks or Ballocks (make up your mind!),

I never said that there's no such thing as a Singapore Cat. All I said was that I didn't know WHY a Singapore Cat was chosen instead of a Singapore Dog and offered a few speculative reasons.

6/07/2005 11:48 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Mr Presidential Hopeful (Maybe when you turn 45)


It is Ballocks and not Bollocks. The latter was a typo due to my lack of schooling which I dare say was quite argh em...Ballocks!!!

As to why they chose a Singapore Cat instead of a Singapore Dog...I have no idea..Most definitely, my vote goes out to whoever who can give me a singapore dog aka Canis familiaris singapura and remove that darn bo chup Kucinta better known as the Singapore Cat...

But then again do I get to vote at all? I wonder...

Awaits your kind advise.

John Ballocks,

PS: I ran spelling check on this one. So it should be error free. Oh, isn't technology great?

6/07/2005 2:06 pm  
Blogger Joel said...

Dear Nessa,

You're hired, baby!

Welcome aboard.

6/07/2005 4:48 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Nessa,

You caught me...argh!!!

I can now imagine how well our country will be prosper under such meticulous (\muh-TIK-yuh-luhs\, adjective:
Extremely or excessively careful about details. )


Embarrased John Ballocks...

6/07/2005 4:59 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

.....leadership and adminstration style.

PS: In my excitement, I submitted my comments why too early.

For that I have to apolgise.

You do not have to spot mistakes on this post as it has already been admitted.


John Ballocks

6/07/2005 5:01 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ooops another spelling error

Apologise and not apolgise.

John Ballocks

6/07/2005 5:02 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home